Xref: alice comp.databases.oracle.server:19987
Path: alice!news-feed.fnsi.net!news.idt.net!howland.erols.net!feed2.news.erols.com!erols!news.ultranet.com!not-for-mail
From: Jojo <jojo@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: Poor documentation choice in HTML
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 10:51:07 -0400
Organization: UltraNet Communications, Inc.   http://www.ultranet.com/
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <35488FDB.B920C51A@nowhere.com>
References: <3547d2ab.437658109@news.bah.com> <35488433.171026EB@caribdata.demon.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@ultra.net
X-Ultra-Time: 30 Apr 1998 14:49:08 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.02 [en] (WinNT; I)

I agree with both of you ... The PDF version is much much better than the
current HTML one .

Paul Miller wrote:

> Hear hear. I couldn't agree more. If anyone has devised a way to conver
> the HTML back into usable PDF format, I will pay handsomely...
>
> Paul Miller
>
> root@virginia.edu wrote:
>
> > Does anyone else feel that the HTML documentation supplied with
> > Oracle8 is difficult to use?
> >
> > Printing, searching, navigating... HTML seems a step in the wrong
> > direction when compared to the pdf format they were using.