Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: OS block size vs. DB block size

Re: OS block size vs. DB block size

From: Peter Sylvester <peters_at_mitre.org>
Date: 1998/03/25
Message-ID: <3519ADD5.226F70F2@mitre.org>#1/1

The Solaris filesystem defaults to 8K blocks, although you can set it up with 4K. You might want to look at the "newfs" command for other options. We setup a small warehousing/mining DB using 8K DB blocks, and played around with some of the newfs params (-f 8192 -i 10485760 -m 2) with good results, although we changed a number of other things too. note that the 8K DB block size might not be too good for OLTP applications, though.

-Peter

S S Wan wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I was confused by the documents from SUN. They said
> that the logical filesystem block size is 8192 bytes but
> the physical block size is 512 bytes. My concern is which
> figure I should take to consider the DB block size, which
> should be integral multiple of the OS block size.
>
> Does anyone have insight?
Received on Wed Mar 25 1998 - 00:00:00 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US