Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Seperate instances vs. seperate schemas

Re: Seperate instances vs. seperate schemas

From: Al <al_at_work>
Date: 1997/12/09
Message-ID: <01bd04ce$65dcb8a0$e9c7e28e@alan_stutchbury>#1/1

Combining two UNRELATED production databases in the same instance can cause you some grief in the event of a recovery. You may need to recover application A to a certain point in time (i.e restore and roll forward). However, this may impact application B, which could generate a political problem between your (two) sets of user communities.

Tao36 <tao36_at_aol.com> wrote in article
<19971205193300.OAA08814_at_ladder01.news.aol.com>...
> I would like to get feedback from this group on the following:
>
> I am dba for a small software company. We currently have 2 products which
 run
> on Oracle with Powerbuilder front-ends. The products are similar in that
 they
> share some common table names and data.
>
> I currently have 4 seperate instances running..... a production and test
> instance for each of the two products.
>
> The current debate between the developers and myself is whether these
 should
> remain as seperate instances, or be combined into one instance as
 different
> schemas. I don't believe either scenario is ideal, but am curious to hear
 the
> thoughts of others on the subject.
>
> Thanks for any insight on this matter.
>
> Kevin
>
Received on Tue Dec 09 1997 - 00:00:00 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US