Re: REGEXP_SUBSTR() is always NULL

From: Maxim Demenko <mdemenko_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:05:17 +0200
Message-ID: <4A43BC5D.5030608_at_gmail.com>



ddf schrieb:
> On Jun 25, 6:52 am, "Álvaro G. Vicario"
> <alvaro.NOSPAMTH..._at_demogracia.com> wrote:
>> ddf escribió:
>>
>>> On Jun 25, 6:29 am, "Álvaro G. Vicario"
>>> <alvaro.NOSPAMTH..._at_demogracia.com> wrote:
>>>> In an Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.1.0.2.0 server,
>>>> REGEXP_SUBSTR() always returns NULL. E.g.:
>>>> SELECT REGEXP_SUBSTR('1234,5678', '\d+', 1, 1)
>>>> FROM DUAL
>>>> In my local 10g XE, however, it returns 1234 as expected.
>>>> Is it me or is it the server?
>>> It may be the server if you are, indeed, comparing XE (10.2.0.1) to a
>>> 10.1.0.2 release.  You're certain you've posted the version for the
>>> Enterprise Edition correctly?
>> Absolutely: SELECT BANNER FROM v$version + clipboard.
>>
>> If it was a legacy edition that did not support REGEXP_SUBSTR() I'd
>> expect an error message.
>>
>> Is it possible to cancel, disabled or override REGEXP_SUBSTR?
>>
>> --
>> --http://alvaro.es- Álvaro G. Vicario - Burgos, Spain
>> -- Mi sitio sobre programación web:http://borrame.com
>> -- Mi web de humor satinado:http://www.demogracia.com
>> --

>
> Things have changed between 10.1 and 10.2:
>
> 10;1 regular expression support --
> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14117_01/server.101/b10759/ap_posix001.htm#i690819
>
> 10.2 regular expression support --
> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/ap_posix001.htm#i690819
>
> These differences may result in the differences you're seeing.
>
>
> David Fitzjarrell

As David already suggested, perl influenced extensions came in 10.2, the list is at
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/ap_posix003.htm

On 10.1 one should use instead the posix syntax REGEXP_SUBSTR('1234,5678', '[[:digit:]]+', 1, 1) or REGEXP_SUBSTR('1234,5678', '[0-9]+', 1, 1) or

Best regards

Maxim

-- 
Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic
and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?

Aksel Peter Jørgensen
Received on Thu Jun 25 2009 - 13:05:17 CDT

Original text of this message