Re: PLSQL vs SQL Parser

From: GWood <sorry_at_nothere.com>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 23:18:14 GMT
Message-ID: <Wyyde.5$kC2.176@news-west.eli.net>

... and very few of us are in a position to dictate IT capital expenses to our companies. We use the tools we are given to work with and rely on the exchange of constructive ideas and experience on groups like this to offset deficiencies in the product (and often our knowledge).

But Sybrand, calling someone "Bush-like" ??? That's a *low* blow ;-)

"Sybrand Bakker" <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote in message news:mjk271hr55p4f6noebfd14r4li4biips7a_at_4ax.com...
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:38:18 -0700, DA Morgan
> <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> >And why are you using a paleolithic, unsupported, version of Oracle for
> >anything?
>
> Come on, Daniel, half the world is still using 8i!!
> And you damn well know that, because several people have explained
> that to you before.
> You are more and more acting like the typical (Georg Bush-like)
> arrogant American, who thinks that the world and America are the same.
> Please wake up and stop trolling, they are definitely not, and boy
> that is good!!!
>
>
> --
> Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
Received on Mon May 02 2005 - 18:18:14 CDT