Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Comparing mat. views with regular tables

Re: Comparing mat. views with regular tables

From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_dial.pipex.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 15:00:24 -0000
Message-ID: <3fad0506$0$5410$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com>


"Rick Denoire" <100.17706_at_germanynet.de> wrote in message news:pmdoqv4u7pilc1t10u4d9rvfs8e4kjqqo6_at_4ax.com...
> Let's suppose I have a materialized view which:
> -must be refreshed with the method "complete" across a DB-link
> -is not updatable
> -will refresh using a cron job
>
> then, couldn't I accomplish the same using a regular table, which will
> be truncated and filled regularly with the same basic definition as
> the materialized view?
>
> Which would be the advantage of a materialized view in this case?

In Enterprise Edition query rewrite. In any edition it can be part of a refresh group.

--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
*****************************************
Please include version and platform
and SQL where applicable
It makes life easier and increases the
likelihood of a good answer
******************************************
Received on Sat Nov 08 2003 - 09:00:24 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US