From: "Ray Porter" <ray_porter@unc.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.misc
References: <3f316caf$1_2@news.unc.edu> <shs2jvo8os2rebb53hihul2v1qjki2mei0@4ax.com> <3f3254c5$1_2@news.unc.edu> <3F3271DC.FEB0F4B8@remove_spam.peasland.com> <3f32a917$1_1@news.unc.edu> <psd5jvkdg7v4ts5h7o57jc5oq27nja8je7@4ax.com> <3f32bddc$1_3@news.unc.edu> <3F32CE3A.2249EBC8@exxesolutions.com>
Subject: Re: pushing tnsnames changes over the network
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:25:58 -0400
Lines: 46
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
NNTP-Posting-Host: 152.2.202.60
Message-ID: <3f33a4e7_2@news.unc.edu>
X-Trace: news.unc.edu 1060349159 152.2.202.60 (8 Aug 2003 09:25:59 -0400)
Organization: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Path: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!rip!chi1.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!snoopy.risq.qc.ca!elk.ncren.net!news.unc.edu!not-for-mail
Xref: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com comp.databases.oracle.misc:130370


"Daniel Morgan" <damorgan@exxesolutions.com> wrote in message
news:3F32CE3A.2249EBC8@exxesolutions.com...
> Ray Porter wrote:
>
>
> As one academic to another ... merge what you can and let everything else
fail.
> After it fails they will ask you to fix it. Tell them what you need to fix
it.
> You'll likely get what you need.
>
> Without failure ... often there are none willing to help with the
solution.
> --

Personally, Dan, I'd be willing to give that a shot.  However, given the
political facts on this campus, I doubt even our CIO (VC level) could push
something like that through, particularly with some of the larger schools
(business, public health, medicine, nursing) that all have large, in-house
technical staffs and numerous in-house and vendor-supplied applications that
central technical support know nothing about.  Oh well, those of us in the
trenches just have to make it all work, no matter the problems created by
the environment.  :(

BTW, thanks for all your help with our data warehousing performance problems
after migrating from Sybase.  Based on your suggestions and extensive
research and hard work on her own, our DBA finally got the database tweaked
sufficiently that the end-users aren't howling for our blood.  The primary
end-user department also invested in its own AIX box with Oracle 9i,
dedicated solely to our applications (one test instance, one production
instance, no more dozen production and dev instances for a dozen different
application groups and systems on one box).  With a little more tweaking we
finally have the application performing as well and usually better than
Sybase except for a few types of queries.  The end-users are finally (after
nearly 6 months) very happy with the change, or at least they aren't
complaining any more.

Thanks,
Ray

PS
I think the little utility I'm writing will solve my original problem by
letting each user execute it from the application web site.


