Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Help a newbie trying to learn PL/SQL - No trace is showing up
"Ana C. Dent" <anacedent_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:lKYXa.37861$Ne.17172_at_fed1read03...
> tk wrote:
> > Hi Folks:
> >
> > I'm doing the examples on p.126/127 of the Oracle 8i Advanced PL/SQL
> > programming book. I have 9i installed so I am not sure if this makes a
> > difference. Mind you, I've only been doing this since Thursday of last
> > week so I am VERY new to this and a moron.
> >
> > I created a user and have issued the following thru SQLPLUS
> > --
> > ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS '10938 trace name context level 10';
> >
> > ALTER PROCEDURE RaiseIt COMPILE DEBUG;
> >
> > -- Anonymous block which raises some exceptions.
> > BEGIN
> > CallRaise(1001);
> > RaiseIt(-1);
> > END;
> > /
> > --
> >
> > Then I go to the udump directory and examine the trace file and do *not*
> > receive the stack trace like the book says I should. Rather I see the
> > following in the trace file... Am I missing some type of
setting/option in
> > order to see the same call-stack trace that the book says I should
see???
> > I don't see any callstack trace in this trace file... Although, I can
> > query the sys.plsql_trace_events and the sys.plsql_trace_runs table and
see
> > data in it. I just don't see it echoed to the following trace file.
> >
> > thanks in advance, Theron
> >
> >
wrong ! it's in ORACLE_HOME ... etc as clearly stated in the OP's mail - or can't you read ?
> >
any reason to yell ? The contents of the file ? As you give the impression that you know, would you care to share ?
> With 9i the results are placed inside the DB & NOT in a trace file.
>
Oh, we don't have a choice anymore !!
Received on Tue Aug 05 2003 - 21:05:13 CDT
![]() |
![]() |