Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Database Tuning Issue or Redesign ??
What is the explain plan and the tk prof output? Also analyzing isn't going
to do much if you insist on putting in a rule hint. Are you using bind
variables? If not do so.
Jim
-- Replace part of the email address: kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com with family. Remove the negative part, keep the minus sign. You can figure it out. "Tony Rees" <antonie.rees_at_btinternet.com> wrote in message news:bbn8ip$o1$1$8300dec7_at_news.demon.co.uk...Received on Thu Jun 05 2003 - 09:16:22 CDT
>
> Dear Gurus,
>
> I have in the last couple of months been working on a project to trap all
> techniciam test data onto an Oracle 817 database. I am using an AMDOCS
> formerly Clarify application. Here is the problem I am now facing:-
>
> When doing a simple select from a table it is taking ages to return the
data
> back. Here is the statement
>
> select /*+rule*/
> * from table_x_audit_hdr where x_detail_number = 'RMA-61214-1'
>
> I have created relevant indexes and analysed both tables and indexes and
by
> looking at the plan for the above statement it is deffinately using the
> indexes which have been refreshed. There are only 1200 records in the
above
> table so this statement should be working really quickly.
>
> The Table that I had to create has just over 600 fields in it !!!. My
DBA's
> in the States (I am in the UK) have said that I should redesign the
> application and try to get the size of the table right down which i have
> come up with a plan that will take 6 weeks to redevelop that will bring
the
> size of the table down to just over a 100 records.
>
> If I do a similar select from another table with only 100 fields in it but
> with 116256 rows of data the select statement is coming back really
quickly
> ie
>
> select /*+rule*/
> * from table_demand)dtl where detail_number = 'RMA-61214-1'
>
> Are there any memory parameters I should be looking at to get this to work
> quicker or would I be better in taking my DBA's advise and redeveloping
the
> whole app to have only 100 fields in it ?????? Or is there some other
thing
> I can not think of to fix this.
>
> Any help and advise would be great as I have been trying to come up with a
> resolve to this for weeeks now
>
> regards
>
> Frustrated developer
>
> Tony
>
>
![]() |
![]() |