Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: If select using rownum savs time?
Perfectly true, as long as it is a "simple" SQL statement (i.e. there
is no "ORDER BY" or "GROUP BY" clause, and you don't use "DISTINCT").
Daniel
"music4" <music4_at_163.net> wrote in message news:<b70gug$qid_at_netnews.proxy.lucent.com>...
> Dear Oracle Guru,
>
> I am writing a Oracle application using OCI. I use C++ on Solaris platform.
>
> I have table that contains a huge number of records (over 100000). And I
> need to select first 5000 records. In my current application, I just use
> "select * from the_table", then only petch first 5000 records.
>
> And today, I happened to get know "rownum", so I am guess if "select * from
> the_table where rownum < 5000" would be efficient. Is that true?
>
> Thanks in advance!
> evan
Received on Wed Apr 09 2003 - 08:56:35 CDT
![]() |
![]() |