Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: General question about fk constraints ...(OT)
Well, one could always revert to the original "skonk works". :)
http://home.wlu.edu/~blackmerh/mouffette/skunkworks.html
Anne (who remembers reading Lil Abner)
Jim Kennedy wrote:
> You need to be careful about using that term. (Skunkworks) it is a
> registered trademark of the Lockheed-Martin Corp. A couple of years ago Dr.
> Dobbs (a computer mag) used that term and got a letter from their attorneys
> informing them of such.
> Jim
>
> --
> Replace part of the email address: kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com
> with family. Remove the negative part, keep the minus sign. You can figure
> it out.
> "Frank" <fvanbortel_at_netscape.net> wrote in message
> news:3E481DA6.1070500_at_netscape.net...
> > Niall Litchfield wrote:
> > > "Jan Gelbrich" <j_gelbrich_at_westfalen-blatt.de> wrote in message
> > > news:b27ql8$1a92b9$1_at_ID-152732.news.dfncis.de...
> > >
> > <snip!>
> > >
> > > RAD when it means Rapid Application Development is good news, Rapid
> Aircraft
> > > Development seems not to be an acronym - I wonder why.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Niall Litchfield
> > > Oracle DBA
> > > Audit Commission UK
> > >
> > >
> > Oh but that's called Skunkworks - make you wonder, doesn't it?
> > They did beautiful aircraft (U2 spy plane to name one) in incredibly
> > short development time.
> >
> > Frank
> >
> >
> >
Received on Tue Feb 11 2003 - 10:14:42 CST
![]() |
![]() |