Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Last Week

Re: Last Week

From: Jim Kennedy <kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 06:23:45 GMT
Message-ID: <RlpZ9.66551$Ve4.6822@sccrnsc03>


You are correct, I made the mistake assuming that you knew the difference between a database and a GUI. Sorry, I won't make such a silly assumption. Jim

--
Replace part of the email address: kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com
with family.  Remove the negative part, keep the minus sign.  You can figure
it out.
"Malcolm Dew-Jones" <yf110_at_vtn1.victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e361def_at_news.victoria.tc.ca...

> Jim Kennedy (kennedy-downwithspammersfamily_at_attbi.com) wrote:
> : You need to distinguish between the database aspects of ms access and
the
> : GUI or form aspects. Comparing a form to a database is like comparing
> : apples and jet planes - two entirely different things.
>
> The original claim, which appears somewhere below, was "nothing you can do
> in MS Access you can't do in Oracle." This claim does not say I have to
> compare any specific product, so your claim that i need to distinguish
> anything is not true. I have compared one important and useful facility
> that MS Access and Oracle both provide - forms.
>
>
> What ms access calls
> : a "parameterized view" is just a stored query.
>
> Yeah, so? If you provide an ms access application with a set of these
> "stored query's" then you use them just like views when building the rest
> of the application. How is this fundamentally different than building and
> using views in oracle? (But is fundamentally different than something
> like MySql, which didn't have anything like this functionality last time I
> checked).
>
>
> Certainly, in Oracle I could
> : create a procedure that took parameters and returned results (which is
> : basically the same as a "parameterized view", just syntactically
expressed
> : differently.
>
> syntactically different - in other words a user cannot use it as a
> building block to create another view, and is therefore not the same
> useful building block as a view.
>
> Beside, Daniel has introduced me to another function, though I will point
> out that it is not documented in my "Oracle 8i The Complete Reference" by
> Oracle Press.
>
>
>
> : Daniel is correct that the so-called Oracle experts in question who
couldn't
> : write a query to get the results as of last week are either lacking in
basic
> : abilities of the most rudimentary type or the question is something
entirely
> : different than what was posted here.
>
> : Jim
>
>
> : "Malcolm Dew-Jones" <yf110_at_vtn1.victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
> : news:3e34afc0_at_news.victoria.tc.ca...
> : > DA Morgan (damorgan_at_exesolutions.com) wrote:
> : > : Bill wrote:
> : >
> : > : > I'm not an Oracle developer but I've been told that it is not
possible
> : > : > to create a query that will select records with a date field for
last
> : > : > week. I've developed an application in MS Access and the Oracle
> : > : > people have been trying to convert into into a Oracle query. I
simply
> : > : > wished to select records from a table for the previous week. Can
> : > : > anyone out there provide a general sql query that will work in
Oracle?
> : > : >
> : > : > Your help is appreciated.
> : > : >
> : > : > Cheers;
> : > : >
> : > : > Bill
> : >
> : > : Jim Kennedy's answer is correct and were I you I would have a seious
> : > : discussion with management about showing whoever gave you such
incorrect
> : > : advise, on such an elementary question, to the door before they do
some
> : > : real damage.
> : >
> : > : It shouldn't take a lot of thinking to realize that there is nothing
you
> : > : can do in MS Access you can't do in Oracle. The reverse is far from
> : true.
> : >
> : > Oh contraire
> : >
> : > there's lots of thing you can do in ms access that you can't do in
oracle,
> : > they just aren't the things that oracle developers expect to do in the
> : > first place.
> : >
> : > I'm not a big fan of ms access, but thst doesn't mean I can't
appreciate
> : > some things it does.
> : >
> : > e.g. I can recall going into debug mode in ms access and interactively
> : > running scripting VB code to systematically adjust forms during some
y2k
> : > conversions. Ater the changes were systemized then each form was
modified
> : > in -almost- batch mode using the developed vb scripts, but still,
before
> : > saving the results, the script used to change each form could be
> : > interactively tweaked and then saved to provide a reusable update for
> : > later, which also definitively documented the changes that were
required
> : > (in a reusable format).
> : >
> : > ms access has other nifty features, such as built in support for
> : > parameterized views. Try writing an oracle view that uses a bind
> : > variable.
> : >
> : > create or replace view tadah as
> : > select * from table where something = :the_selector;
> : >
> : > (Doesn't work).
>
>
>
> --
Received on Tue Jan 28 2003 - 00:23:45 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US