Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: HELP: exp/imp migration from oracle 8i to oracle 9i
yeah, i booted from the new HD. are there any files i need to add/modify
someplace in the oracle directory before this will work?
thanks,
john
"Karsten Farrell" <kfarrell_at_belgariad.com> wrote in message
news:PM1R9.1086$48.88086573_at_newssvr17.news.prodigy.com...
> John Merkel III wrote:
> > i'm attempting to move my oracle 8i personal edition DB which is on
win2k to
> > an oracle 9i personal edition DB which i am running on win2k (i'm
swapping
> > out hard drives on the same computer).
> >
> > here is what i did:
> >
> > 1. installed win2k on the new HD
> >
> > 2. installed oracle 9i on the new HD
> >
> > 3. booted up the old HD and ran
> >
> > exp system/manager file=nnexpdat30dec02.dmp full=y
> >
> > 4. moved the nnexpdat30dec02.dmp file to the new HD
> >
> > 5. booted up the new HD and ran
> >
> > imp system/manager file=nnexpdat30dec02.dmp full=y
> >
> > when i did this i get the following errors:
> >
> > IMP-00058: ORACLE error 12560 encountered
> >
> > ORA-12560: TNS:protocol adapter error
> >
> > IMP-00000: Import terminated unsuccessfully
> >
> > could this have something to do with my computer name changing when i
> > installed win2k on the new HD? or am i trying to make this a much
simpler
> > process than it really is? what do i need to do to move my DB over?
> >
> > any help would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > thank you in advance,
> >
> > john
> >
> >
> The steps you've outlined should work *IF* you have a different Windows
> registry on both HDs. That should be the case if you really mean that
> you booted from the new HD to run imp. Lots of environment parameters
> are stored in the registry (HKLM\Software\Oracle\HomeN, where N is a
> home number). The old HD will have 8i stuff and the new HD will have 9i
> stuff. If you have another HD and installed Oracle there, however, then
> you'll have multiple Oracle homes (but you said the new HD was a
> "replacement" HD, so I don't think this is your problem).
>
>
Received on Thu Jan 02 2003 - 17:06:11 CST
![]() |
![]() |