Path: news.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.204!attbi_feed4!attbi.com!rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alex Ivascu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.misc Subject: diff between HPUX and Solaris? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 9 Message-ID: <0PKQ9.404976$GR5.126166@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.126.137.208 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net 1041463612 24.126.137.208 (Wed, 01 Jan 2003 23:26:52 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 23:26:52 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 23:26:52 GMT Xref: newsfeed1.easynews.com comp.databases.oracle.misc:90981 X-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 16:26:22 MST (news.easynews.com) when it comes to Oracle (9i)? I've never worked w/ HPUX, and this new (potential) position has a couple of HP servers. I assume UX is UX, but you never know... Please let me know your thoughts... TIA, and HAPPY NEW YEAR! -- Alex Ivascu