Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Transaction, Oracle
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, ootto_at_genese.de wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> we know this from our basicly used database. We use this
> behaviour to do our database updates. The main reason is that
> we can rollback all database modification if the
> update-function run into an error and the user is able to use
> the previous version.
Sounds like you are adding columns to a table instead of rows to a table? That is bad design.
> It is the best thing you can do. Or do you have another idea
> for this ..?!
Redesign what you are doing.
-- Galen BoyerReceived on Tue Dec 17 2002 - 13:11:14 CST
![]() |
![]() |