Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Which transaction isolation level can prevent lost updates?

Re: Which transaction isolation level can prevent lost updates?

From: Arno Huetter <huetter_at_grz.at>
Date: 26 Nov 2002 22:45:28 -0800
Message-ID: <a710c60d.0211262245.4c885a52@posting.google.com>


"Brian E Dick" <bdick_at_cox.net> wrote in message news:<yfJE9.29020$wc2.1290111_at_news2.east.cox.net>...
> And your container doesn't give you hooks to modify the SQL before
> submission to the RDBMS? What vendor?

Brian,

you are right, I could use bean-managed persistence, hence write my own SQLs, but I was not planing to employ it (breaking the chosen container-managed persistence approach) unless absolutely necessary. Most vendors implement pessimistic-locking on applicatin level, so the developer should not really be concerned with these kind of issues.

Kind regards,
Arno Huetter Received on Wed Nov 27 2002 - 00:45:28 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US