Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Which transaction isolation level can prevent lost updates?
"Brian E Dick" <bdick_at_cox.net> wrote in message news:<yfJE9.29020$wc2.1290111_at_news2.east.cox.net>...
> And your container doesn't give you hooks to modify the SQL before
> submission to the RDBMS? What vendor?
Brian,
you are right, I could use bean-managed persistence, hence write my own SQLs, but I was not planing to employ it (breaking the chosen container-managed persistence approach) unless absolutely necessary. Most vendors implement pessimistic-locking on applicatin level, so the developer should not really be concerned with these kind of issues.
Kind regards,
Arno Huetter
Received on Wed Nov 27 2002 - 00:45:28 CST
![]() |
![]() |