Okay, are they on different controllers as well?
"Vince Laurent" <vlaurent_at_NOSPAM.networkusa.net> wrote in message
news:pnl7muct203nmtrpfbqhaf5j86spa05iv9_at_4ax.com...
> According the the SAN Manager, yes, a different set of spindles. We
> have the Oracle DB and files in a rather large SAN and when we set up
> the redo logs the HP rep/Basis Consultant made sure of it.
>
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2002 09:37:22 -0400, "Alan"
> <alan_remove_this_shein_at_erols.com> wrote:
>
> >Is the archive file system on a different *physical* drive than all of
the
> >redo log groups AND all of the tablespaces?
> >
> >"Vince Laurent" <vlaurent_at_NOSPAM.networkusa.net> wrote in message
> >news:v3d5mucd5m4vu9ni82e1r6csk65ieaj4lk_at_4ax.com...
> >> We have HP OpenView monitoring our Oracle Database. I get the
> >> following message every so often:
> >>
> >> Message Text : DBSPI-0060.1: Redo logs unarchived count (2.00) is too
> >> high for PRD (>=1.50).
> >> Original Text: DBSPI-0060: 2.00 (Threshold 1.50 exceeded)
>
>
Received on Wed Aug 21 2002 - 14:21:23 CDT
