Path: news.easynews.com!easynews!uunet!dfw.uu.net!ash.uu.net!news.chatlink.com!not-for-mail From: Pieter Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.misc Subject: Re: Implicit or explicit cursor? Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 17:54:57 -0400 Organization: OWDS Inc. Lines: 22 Message-ID: <3CFFDA31.4030508@ivwnet.com> References: <08lvfus2e8hvp2bnqlg4c6ispgg61rs9vt@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 1cust228.tnt2.frederick.md.da.uu.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.chatlink.com 1023400496 10908 67.208.68.228 (6 Jun 2002 21:54:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@chatlink.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 21:54:56 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020508 Netscape6/6.2.3 X-Accept-Language: en,nl,pdf Xref: easynews comp.databases.oracle.misc:82604 X-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 14:52:23 MST (news.easynews.com) I am thinking that implicit cursor should be the correct answer Martin Soederstroem wrote: > I am reading OCP Certification Exam Guide from Oracle Press. In this > book there are questions. One of these questions reads: > > "Unless otherwise defined, every SQL statement executes in > this type of cursor:_________" > > The answer that is given to the question is "explicit". Now, am I > really stupid, or should it actually be "implicit"? > > Oracle doesn't provide any errata for this printing. > -- Remove '-123' (no quotes) from the e-mail address when you want to reply -Happy Trails ;-)