From my perspective there are "coverage" issues beyond the potential
inaccuracies. That is to say, what's on the "exam proper", is not entirely
covered within the confines of the "Couchman", 9i SQL Exam book. I know, I
took the exam yesterday. I'm not looking to blame anyone. This also likely
affects the author and places him in a very difficult spot. Couchman's
claiming Oracle changed some of the 9i SQL content on him once the book was
published. If so, this isn't fair to him and the exam writers, particularly
in light of the high pass requirement. Oracle University/OCP and the 9i exam
community needs to be apprised of this. These oversights will diminish the
value of the 9i OCP designations if not addressed quickly and properly.
PB
"Daniel Morgan" <dmorgan_at_exesolutions.com> wrote in message
news:3CE2A71E.E50F0319_at_exesolutions.com...
> BSI News wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I recently took this 9i, iSQL, OCP exam. While I prefer to reserve my
> > comments for the time being, has anyone else taken this exam? What did
you
> > think? Have you found problems with either the content or accuracy of
the
> > questions of this exam?
> > Thanks in advance,
> > PB
>
> I think you've made your opinion perfectly clear. ;-)
>
> One question ... do the inaccuracies mirror those in the books?
>
> Or are they new and creative?
>
> Daniel Morgan
>
Received on Wed May 15 2002 - 15:58:40 CDT
