Yes, I believe JDBC does also. One place I used to work thought that was
silly and created a wrapper class so they could use named parameters. The
class handled the ? assignment so the developer could use a named parameter
for the bind variable. It sure made debugging etc. easier. Less chance of
error.
Jim
"tojo" <tom_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1746f71edb0d059998968a_at_news.t-online.de...
> In article <3cda313f$0$237$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net>, n-
> litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk says...
> > which reminds me of a question I've meant to ask a number of times. Is
it
> > possible to use named parameters rather than the question mark notation
in
> > ADO ?
> >
>
> It's sad, but no. ADO replaces the question marks with param values in
> the order you defined them. I think JDBC works the same way (but dont
> quote me). OO4O is clearly superior in this area.
>
> -- Tom
Received on Sat May 11 2002 - 08:34:32 CDT
