Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: 11i Finanancials on NT 4.0
Best of luck! In my experience it will be the biggest lesson in frustration
you've tried.
I've installed Oracle Finapps numerous times from MPL 5 (anyone remember
that?) thru 10.7 (no 11i yet, so maybe things have gotten better in the
Windoze port?) on VMS and multiple flavors of Unix. The worst experience I
ever had was trying to install 10.7 on NT. Fortunately it, too was a test
database at home for experimentation. I marked the experiment as "FAILED"
and vowed to never try such foolishness again. But, your results may
vary...best of luck and let us know how it goes.
"Bannas and Cheese" <sbrincat_at_bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:4SxS7.8588$_z.22532_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Well It is only going to be a test database (vision) purely experimental
for
> home use only, 1 user at the max, I dont see it will be problem. The box
is
> not a server I am just going to run NT Server 4.0, 1 GIG RAM, 1
GIG
> CPU and abour 50 GIG Hard Disk Space, i reckon I'll be fine.
> "vyper" <tgga_at_vyper.karoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:u1d38qgup5ej59_at_corp.supernews.com...
> >
> > "Greg Kainz" <gregkainz_at_attbi.com> wrote in message
> > news:MZnR7.7578$7y.60670_at_rwcrnsc54...
> > > Take a handful of valium and go to bed until the urge passes. :-)
> > > Then, buy a couple of Unix servers and install there. Just my
opionion,
> > and
> > > I'm severely biased!
> > > "Bannas and Cheese" <sbrincat_at_bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
> > > news:oilR7.443836$bY5.1839815_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> > > > I am about to install 11i on NT 4.0 any one got any tips.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I'm not severley biased, but I hope that your NT server(s) are very high
> > spec. To be honest I'd do it on UNIX, or even SuSE Linux if I was you. I
> > installed it across 2 SuSE 7.2 servers about 2 weeks back. Best advice
is
> > the more disks, and more processors and more memory you can squash into
> your
> > boxes the better. I wouldn't attempt a single server option at all btw.
> >
> >
> > Pete
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Fri Dec 14 2001 - 23:45:41 CST
![]() |
![]() |