Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.tools -> Re: diff bewteen 8i and 9i?
-- Jonathan Lewis Yet another Oracle-related web site: http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk Practical Oracle 8i: Building Efficient Databases Publishers: Addison-Wesley Reviews at: http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/book_rev.html Nuno Souto wrote in message <3b161fc0.860355_at_news-server>...Received on Sat Jul 21 2001 - 16:47:18 CDT
>On Thu, 31 May 2001 19:12:28 +1000, "Howard J. Rogers"
><howardjr_at_www.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Incidentally, I forgot to mention: ORA-1555s are a thing of the past,
since
>>you can now protect rollback required for read-consisitent image
preparation
>>for any given length of time (the default appears to be 30 seconds). Must
>>be worth an upgrade for that fact alone, I'd say.
>
>
>Hehehe! Not so fast, bro Rogers! It's still possible, we just can
>delay it for quite a while. Or so my reading of David's prezzie lead
>me to believe.
>
>Not sure exactly how that's gonna work. How the heck are we supposed
>to know what's a sufficient delay? Suck it and see?
>
Of course, it does require you to specify a tablespace made of files that can autoextend - then it just lets the rollback segments grow as big as necessary. It's a nice easy option for slowing the database down if you want to be lazy and avoid thinking.
![]() |
![]() |