From: "MyTwoBits" <nighr@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: performance drop of >35% from Oracle 7.1 to 8.05
Date: 2000/06/06
Message-ID: <YOY_4.7017$gr4.271030@news1.rdc1.il.home.com>#1/1
References: <01bfcf04$73b73ab0$ab4815ac@HKTGN0002251944> <960222588.944.0.pluto.d4ee154e@news.demon.nl> <qDR_4.4051$vc5.323638@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net
X-Trace: news1.rdc1.il.home.com 960256312 24.8.238.9 (Mon, 05 Jun 2000 18:51:52 PDT)
Organization: @Home Network
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 18:51:52 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.misc,comp.os.vms


I'm sure that Linus, Bill and Scott are teaming up to mount a counter-attack
Maybe every Internet user is going to get that killer DecNet protocol for
their DecStation.  I'm going to hide my TK-50 tapes now.

My ribs hurt.  I lost my Vax administrator job 8 years ago.  The recent
activity at Compaq includes engineers using EDT to write their resumes and
print them on LN01 printers.  I'm sure they can be retrained for the Linux
support desk.

In the years since, I've learned Oracle and don't care what the operating
system it's on.  Last winter I showed a mainframe programmer how to connect
to an NT Oracle installation from his OS/390 beast to do table backups via
export and SQL*Net.  With the exception of power plants and hospitals where
I would be cautious about migrations, there is no reason why anyone would
stay on VMS a second longer than they had to.  Just to run Oracle?  Please.

My25/c.

"John Nixon" <jorlnixon@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:qDR_4.4051$vc5.323638@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> "Sybrand Bakker" <postbus@sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote in message
> news:960222588.944.0.pluto.d4ee154e@news.demon.nl...
>
> snip
> > IMO, frankly I think VMS is on the way out. I remember seeing remarks on
 KPN
> > dropping this platform too. This is of course a pity, but was to be
 expected
> > after DEC was bought by Compaq
>
> Uhoh,   I hope you are wearing your flak jacket...   That was a pretty
 dumb
> statement considering the board you are on and all the recent activity in
> the VMS
> world.
>
> You are right about the two process implementation though.





