Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.tools -> Re: 8i on Solaris
ttrivedi wrote:
>
> QUESTION:
> My site has an Oracle 8i server (E450, Solaris 2.6, 512m memory, 1g
> swap)
> with a database under 1g in size that's the backend for a Remedy
> installation.
>
> Question is...the kernel parameters on this system look a little crazy
> to
> me, specifically:
>
> set shmsys:shminfo_shmmax=671088640
> set shmsys:shminfo_shmmin=1
> set shmsys:shminfo_shmmni=2000
> set shmsys:shminfo_shmseg=125
> set semsys:seminfo_semmns=4000
> set semsys:seminfo_semmni=1400
> set semsys:seminfo_semmsl=2000
>
> My reading of Oracle's recommendations suggest the settings should be:
>
> set shmsys:shminfo_shmmax=268435456
> set shmsys:shminfo_shmmin=1
> set shmsys:shminfo_shmmni=100
> set shmsys:shminfo_shmseg=10
> set shmsys:seminfo_semmsl=110
> set semsys:seminfo_semmni=100
> set semsys:seminfo_semmns=210
> set semsys:seminfo_semopm=100
> set semsys:seminfo_semvmx=32767
>
> The settings were configured by a DBA here who apparently used to work
> for
> Oracle so others have been loathe to change them. I've pointed a couple
> people on this project at the Oracle recommendations, but wanted to
> check
> this with a few other DBAs to get a group opinion. Any thoughts out
> there
> in DBA land? :-) If nothing else, I thought we should get that shmmax
> down below the amount of physical memory on the system.
>
> TIA...
>
> Tapan H Trivedi
I've seen installs like that and whilst from a common sense point of view they look a little dodgey, I've never seen the (oversized) settings actually cause problems.
Cheers
-- =========================================== Connor McDonald http://www.oracledba.co.uk We are born naked, wet and hungry...then things get worseReceived on Mon Apr 10 2000 - 00:00:00 CDT
![]() |
![]() |