Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Microsoft destroys TPC-C records!
What about SQLAnywhere? Will sybase add all features from it to Adaptive Server Enterprise?
In comp.databases.sybase Christopher Browne <cbbrowne_at_news.hex.net> wrote:
> Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw a time when Norris would say:
>>In comp.databases.sybase Nemo <Nemo_at_nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>The only one back then with true row locking, BTW. >> >>> Sorry to be picky - but the first Db with row-level locking was RDB on >>> VMS. Oracle bought them and tried to "kill" it!! >> >>> -old VMS guy >> >>Hope Sybase wouldn't kill powerbuilder
> Not likely.
> Oracle bought RDB in order to get:
> a) Access to the RDB customers
> b) Access to the RDB developers
> c) Access to the RDB code base.
> All of those things are *primarily* of value to Oracle insofar as they
> become *Oracle* customers, developers, and code. It makes a lot of
> sense for Oracle to buy RDB, chew it up, ingest the useful parts to
> become part of the "Oracle Operations," and then spit out the bones.
> For PowerBuilder, there is *no* overlap between the functionality of
> Sybase Dynamic Server and that of PowerBuilder.
> Indeed, when Oracle is selling SQL*Forms, Designer 2000, and such, and
> Microsoft is selling Access and such, as front end tools, Sybase
> needed, fairly desparately, to *add* something like PowerBuilder to
> their arsenal of tools.
> There are nefarious things Sybase could do with PowerBuilder; deciding
> to discontinue it altogether isn't one of the options that makes a
> whole lot of sense...
> --
> "It is far from complete, but it should explain enough that you don't
> just stare at your sendmail.cf file like a deer staring at an oncoming
> truck." -- David Charlap
> cbbrowne@ntlug.org- <http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/rdbms.html>
--
http://www.cooper.com.hk
Received on Thu Apr 06 2000 - 05:08:05 CDT
![]() |
![]() |