Xref: alice comp.databases:43403 comp.databases.oracle.misc:54248 comp.databases.oracle.server:86135 comp.databases.sybase:63402
Path: alice!news-feed.fnsi.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsgate.cuhk.edu.hk!news.netfront.net!adenine.netfront.net!jcheong
From: Norris <jcheong@cooper.com.hk>
Newsgroups: comp.databases,comp.databases.oracle.misc,comp.databases.oracle.server,comp.databases.sybase,comp.sys.sun.misc,comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: Microsoft destroys TPC-C records!
Date: 4 Mar 2000 02:25:28 GMT
Organization: Netfront http://www.netfront.net/
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <89ps6o$kpe$1@adenine.netfront.net>
References: <38ace385$1$8288@readdo01.news> <isGr4.1172$x5.89278@news1.frmt1.sfba.home.com> <38B8BCE6.E45FD33E@qnet.com> <89et1e$1fn$1@web1.cup.hp.com> <89n6fq$1hb0$1@adenine.netfront.net> <38bf91c0.4418315@news-server>
X-Trace: adenine.netfront.net 952136728 21294 202.81.252.1 (4 Mar 2000 02:25:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@netfront.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Mar 2000 02:25:28 GMT
User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-980818 ("Laura") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/3.2-RELEASE (i386))

Both SQL Server and the NT platform have significantly increased their OLTP scalability and concurrency capabilities.
Yes, they finally are able to use the shared-nothing RDBMS architecture for NT clusters and improve support for VLDBs and 24x365 operations.

http://www.gartner.com/webletter/informix/article1/article1.html

In comp.databases.sybase Nuno Souto <nsouto@nsw.bigpond.net.au.nospam> wrote:
> On 3 Mar 2000 02:02:34 GMT, Norris <jcheong@cooper.com.hk> wrote:
>>called distributed partitioned views. This configuration let Microsoft
>>physically distribute slices of a single table across multiple servers
>>but logically access the table as an integrated whole. Microsoft calls
>>this configuration a "federated database," a precursor to the 100
>>percent shared-nothing cluster architecture plans for Yukon (the

> Shewt! They finally are able to do what I was doing in ORACLE since
> V6.  Amazing. That's progress!   I'm stunned.

> Of course, they had to rename it into "federated database" when
> everybody else calls it a distributed view.  Makes it sound like a new
> technology. And all the idiots out there will go "Wow!"...


> Cheers
> Nuno Souto
> nsouto@nsw.bigpond.net.au.nospam
> http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/the_Den/index.html


-- 
http://www.cooper.com.hk
