Xref: alice comp.databases.oracle.misc:45393 comp.databases.oracle.server:71586
Path: alice!news-feed.fnsi.net!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!bullseye.news.demon.net!demon!news.demon.nl!demon!sybrandb.demon.nl!not-for-mail
From: "Sybrand Bakker" <postmaster@sybrandb.demon.nl>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.misc,comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: Mystery files
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 19:03:08 +0200
Message-ID: <940957416.18069.0.pluto.d4ee154e@news.demon.nl>
References: <3815DDCB.1B94503B@Unforgettable.com>
Reply-To: "Sybrand Bakker" <postmaster@sybrandb.nospam.demon.nl>
X-Trace: news.demon.nl 940957416 pluto:18069 NO-IDENT sybrandb.demon.nl:212.238.21.78
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Lines: 47

They're not mystery files. They are the physical representation of the
sockets Oracle is using for interprocess communication between the
background processes.
'Obsolete' files can be safely deleted.

Hth,


--
Sybrand Bakker, Oracle DBA
Kenneth C Stahl <BlueSax@Unforgettable.com> wrote in message
news:3815DDCB.1B94503B@Unforgettable.com...
> I have come across something that puzzles me - but before I get into the
> details of what I've discovered I'll describe the environment:
>
> Hardware: Compaq ProLient
> OS: Unixware 2.1.2
> RDBMS: Oracle V7.3.4.0
> Sqlnet: V2
> Database instances: 2 - using MTS. Both instances use a common listener on
> port 1521.
>
>
> Hopefully that is enough info.
>
> What I have found is that in the /var/tmp directory there is a hidden
> directory named .oracle and in this directory is a number of files which
> have a form like S#nnnnn.1 (where nnnn is a 1-5 digit number). If I run
> 'file' against these files it is reported as a fifo. If I do a 'ls -l' the
> permissions are
> p-w--w--w-
>
> While I can't be sure of this, the timestamps of the files seems to
> coincide with the times over the past few months when the server (or just
> database) has been bounced.
>
> Does anyone know what these function these files fulfill? Is it safe to
> delete files that are older than the most recent file? Is there any place
> where
> these files are documented? Is it possible that they should not be there
> and that they only exist because of a mistake in
installation/configuration
> of the database instances?
>
> Any info appreciated.


