Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: "= null" & "is null"
Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> wrote:
> Norris <johnnie_at_cooper.com.hk> wrote in message
> news:7qat7c$rvt$1_at_adenine.netfront.net...
>> Maybe I need to change my question to the difference between "<> null"
>> and "is not null".
> "<> Null" Is still a meaningless statement. Is Not Null means there is a
> known value. <> Null would mean is not equal to an unknown value.
"<> Null" is a meaningless statement? So, in any cases, we should never use it, am I right?
--
Have several nice days...
Received on Fri Sep 03 1999 - 04:54:20 CDT
![]() |
![]() |