Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Oracle Parallel Server Option
> Just two comments. Firstly, on the multiple skilled sysadmins. I've
worked on
> a site where we lost the database and had to recover due to a *&&%#
sysadmin
> mounting one of the raw devices containing a datafile. Maybe saying
"multiple
> skilled" is overkill, but better safe than sorry! Secondly, I don't
think
> you'll see any move from Oracle away from parallel processing - as
for the DBA
> who made the comment originally, I'd love to know where he got that
from!
>
> Pete
>
I do not think Oracle is reducing support for OPS either since if they
were why would version 8 include such new OPS features as multiple
instance views, gv$ tables, and provide their own lock manager instead
of having the OS vendors provide it. With 8.1 there are more
improvements with OPS. Still, if an Oracle product does not sell then
Oracle has been known to drop the product.
--
Mark D. Powell -- The only advice that counts is the advice that
you follow so follow your own advice --
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Received on Fri Jun 25 1999 - 08:48:11 CDT
![]() |
![]() |