Re: Partitioning question.

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 19:52:00 +0100
Message-ID: <925930663.24704.0.nnrp-04.9e984b29@news.demon.co.uk>

There are a couple of Word articles on my Web site about partition views and
partition tables. (Under the section
'database features').

65 Partitions is a perfectly reasonable number, and likely to give you some significant administrative benefits without introducing much of a performance overhead.

Jonathan Lewis
Yet another Oracle-related web site: www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Prasanth Duvvur wrote in message <37308AD8.4C5C7432_at_fyiowa.com>...
>I would like to split up a 20 gig table into approx 65 partitions. Is
>there any disadvantage to having this many partitions? Has anybody come
>across any problems with partitions - known bugs etc? If you could point
>me to some un-biased literature on the subject I would appreciate it.
Received on Wed May 05 1999 - 13:52:00 CDT