Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: SQL Server v Oracle
Fergal,
I seriously doubt anything is unbiased. What do you mean by "large"?
> Could anyone give me or point me in the direction of and unbiased comparison
> of SQL Server 7 and Oracle 8 in a very large databases NT based environment.
Q. Why is SQL Server better/worse than Oracle? (v1.1 1999.03.11)
But for those who have to have a pro and con list, here is one to get you started (though no doubt some of the points would be contested). It assumes SQL 7 and Oracle 8.
Pro's of SQL Server
On the same NT hardware as Oracle, SQL Server has the best tpcc numbers. (www.tpc.org)
Mobile/client version of product is exactly the same as the server one (with Oracle it isn't)
SQL 7 has better dynamic space and memory management
SQL 7 is easier to install, use and manage
SQL Server is cheaper to buy than Oracle (though this is such a small part of lifetime support costs it really shouldn't be a consideration)
Extra facilities "in the box" - e.g. OLAP, English Query, DTS
Pro's of Oracle
Scales higher than SQL 7 - whether your system needs to scale that high is doubtful. SQL 7 should be fine for 1 Terabyte of data and 2500 users. (These are conservative figures and are more to do with NT's scalability than SQL's).
Clusters better than SQL
More powerful 3GL language than SQL - PLSQL vs TSQL
Runs on non-NT platforms - e.g. Unix, MVS.
Been around longer.
Neil Pike MVP/MCSE. Protech Computing Ltd
(Please post ALL replies to the newsgroup only unless indicated otherwise)
For SQL FAQ entries see
http://go.compuserve.com/sqlserver (library 1) - latest stuff is always here
www.ntfaq.com/sql.html
http://www.swynk.com/faq/sql/sqlserverfaq.asp
Received on Sun Apr 18 1999 - 06:35:46 CDT
![]() |
![]() |