Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Project Cascade vs Oracle 8i vs Samba?

Re: Project Cascade vs Oracle 8i vs Samba?

From: Chad Schrock <chad_at_radix.net>
Date: 1998/09/18
Message-ID: <3603120B.3E033291@radix.net>#1/1

Supak Lailert wrote:
> jon_at_prl.philips.co.uk (Jon Piesing) writes:
> >Jeremy Allison (jeremy_at_netcom.com) wrote:
> >: lailert_at_slip.net (Supak Lailert) writes:
 

> >: >Fully support of NT ACLs? Also Cascade provides more services
> >: >such as PDC.
 

> >: Funny you should mention ACL's - they're the next
> >: thing I'm going to be coding into the Samba-2 tree :-).
 

> >If Cascade does NT file level ACL's then we will look at it
> >carefully.
>
> Then I recommend you look closely at NetApp filers.
>
> I tested it and it does a good job supporting both UNIX and NT
> (including ACLs) rather seemlessly.

Not quite.

We have the same problem on our Auspicies and NetApp: if you change the permissions on the UNIX side, it clobbers the NT permissions. Same deal the other way around. The permissions work Ok if one of them is set up for some sort of "global user."

Thankfully, I am not working on that project at all, but I do know that our NetApp guy has been in a couple of times working on it. (His solutions, so far, haven't even come close to our requirements.)

Before you flame/etc... I run the Suns and the UNIX servers in the office and do not do anything with the NT systems right now. I do not know any more details of the problem that we are having. Thank you. :)

--
chad@		
radix.net
Received on Fri Sep 18 1998 - 00:00:00 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US