Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Project Cascade vs Oracle 8i vs Samba?

Re: Project Cascade vs Oracle 8i vs Samba?

From: Jeremy Allison <jeremy_at_netcom.com>
Date: 1998/09/14
Message-ID: <jeremyEzAAxz.J6J@netcom.com>#1/1

lailert_at_slip.net (Supak Lailert) writes:

>Fully support of NT ACLs? Also Cascade provides more services such as PDC.

Funny you should mention ACL's - they're the next thing I'm going to be coding into the Samba-2 tree :-).

The PDC stuff is harder though - although we're working on it :-).

>Some commercial implementation such as Syntax TAS uses kernel-level
>implementation which should help boost performance under high load.

Syntax TAS is a *user* level implementation, just like Samba. The only part of TAS in the kernel are the streams drivers for things like AppleTalk and NetWare.

And dont talk about TAS performace under load, you obviously haven't run any benchmarks :-).

Cheers,

	Jeremy Allison,
	Samba Team.
Received on Mon Sep 14 1998 - 00:00:00 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US