Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.tools -> Re: Performance Question
Are you indexing key rows (For bibliographic entries, I would assume at least Last Name, Title, Subject)?
For me, a simple query involving LIKE (where the first character is not a wild card) takes under 1 second on indexed columns in a table of about 800,000 rows. Searching an un-indexed column easily takes over a minute. I'm running Oracle7.3.2 on an IBM RS6000 AIX server.
On 25 Mar 1998 17:46:41 GMT, sraffert_at_umabnet.umab.edu (Steve Rafferty) wrote:
>Hello everyone -- and thanks for the advice from those
>who responded to my performance question regarding
>ORDER BY.
>
>I have managed to improve performance considerably, but
>so far, not enough. I am running Oracle8 Server on a
>Sun Netra with 128M of memory. I have a table with
>90,000 rows, each of which comprise 55 fields (VARCHAR2
>mostly). The table is bibliographic records and the
>primary type of SELECT is of a regex 'like' variety.
>
>I have improved performance mostly by increasing the
>size of the sort_area and a few other init parameters.
>When I started attempting to tune, a simple query took
>105 seconds to complete -- now, a simple query takes
>35 seconds to complete.
>
>My question is: Is this reasonable for a table of
>this size/description in this environment with that
>type of query? I had expected it to be quite a bit
>faster.
>
>I have some ideas as to how to change the way my
>application works to get the user some data to look
>at more quickly, but I'm interested in seeing what
>people who actually know what they're doing think
>of these performance measurements.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>Steve
Received on Wed Mar 25 1998 - 00:00:00 CST
![]() |
![]() |