Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Order of sequence number generation
Joseph D. Sumalbag wrote:
>
> Christian Derreth wrote:
> >
> > Sabarinath Nair wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have a sequence created using the foolowing SQL.
> > >
> > > create sequence SEQ_MESSAGE_ID INCREMENT BY 1 START WITH 100 maxvalue
> > > 999999999999 ORDER;
> > >
> > > When I use this sequence, thru a stored procedure, the sequence numbers
> > > which are generated are not incrimented by 1. instead it gets increments
> > > of 20. 1, 21, 42 etc...
> > >
> > > Does any one know how to get around this...
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Sabari
> >
> > Dear Sabarinath,
> >
> > this may be due to sequence number caching. Try the NOCACHE parameter.
> >
> > Regards, Christian.
>
> Or it could also be that the user obtained the number first
> and committed it last .....That way the later number will apper
> to have been first before the least number .
>
> I usually dont like using this sequence number when I'm
> playing with controlled number such as check numbers and
> others.... coz when a user obtained them and did not commit
> that number is lost or if you shutdown the Db, every sequence
> number in your cache is gone , but they are really good when you
> need to supply unique keys .
>
> Ciao !
> ================================================================
> ============================
> | Joseph Sumalbag
> |
> | Oracle DBA
> |
> |
> |
> | The opinions expressed above are my own and doesn't
necessarily |
I had the same problem and found out there were 20 rows in system.dual
table
by some reason. if the SQL statement goes like this
select sequence_no.nextval from dual;
-- John Y. Chan Manager, Data Services RTE Asset Management (aka. Rightime Econometrics, Inc.) 1095 Rydal Rd. Rydal, PA 19046 (215) 572-7288 (Voice) (215) 572-6254 (Fax)Received on Fri Oct 31 1997 - 00:00:00 CST
![]() |
![]() |