| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
|  |  | |||
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Recommended datafile sizes.
another advantage of smaller datafiles is that recovery time from a corrupted datafile or disk is faster because you can recover a single datafile for a point in time recovery.
Regards,
Richard Fuoco
On Wed, 02 Apr 1997 17:56:07 -0700, mlarson <mdlarson_at_brain.uccs.edu> wrote:
>My vote is for the smaller files.  The large files must be placed on
>larger disks, which means one drive head is responsible for more data
>retrieval.  A 500Meg file spec is a good one.
>
>Matt
>
>Tim.Middleton_at_health.wa.gov.au wrote:
>
>  Hi guys & gals,
>
>  I am looking for some comments on the following scenario.
>
>  I have a tablespace which is large (about 8Gb).  When creating the
>  datafiles for this tablespace, Is is better to have, say. 2 x 4Gb
>  datafiles or should i have 16x500Mb datafiles.
>
>  What are the advantages/disadvantages of each approach.
>
>  Thanks very much.
>
>  Tim Middleton
>
>  PS. Please email me.
>  PPS. Also where can i find the FAQ's for this newsgroup. Tar.
>
>  Tim.Middleton_at_health.wa.gov.au.
>  DMR Consulting Group Australia
>  +619 222 4116
>
>  -------------------==== Posted via Deja News
>  ====-----------------------
>        http://www.dejanews.com/     Search, Read, Post to Usenet
>
>
>
Received on Thu Apr 03 1997 - 00:00:00 CST
|  |  |