From: Fabrizio Vassallo <oracle@echo.ifc.pi.cnr.it>
Subject: Re: Enterprise vs Workgroup?
Date: 1997/03/03
Message-ID: <857383514.30533@dejanews.com>#1/1
References: <5fc0an$rii@lana.zippo.com>
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/3.0 (X11; I; HP-UX A.09.01 9000/755)
X-Originating-IP-Addr: 131.114.209.27 (echo.ifc.pi.cnr.it)
Organization: Deja News Usenet Posting Service
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Mar 03 10:05:16 1997 GMT
X-Authenticated-Sender: Fabrizio Vassallo <oracle@echo.ifc.pi.cnr.it>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server,comp.databases.oracle.tools,comp.databases.oracle.misc



Sorry, the beginning was

We think to migrate from Oracle7 server on HP-UX, HP 9000/755
to a server on Windows NT on Pentium 200.
> We had to store and retrieve echofilms taken in various (~5) client
 echostations.
>
> I would like to know
> a) if there are relevant differences in the performances of
>    Enterprise and Workgroup (apart the presence or not of parallel
>    query option and other options)
>
> b) if there will be a relevant difference of performance passing to
>    Pentium (with Enterprise) from HP.
>
> I hope I gave sufficient info.
> Any hint will be appreciated
>
> Many thanks
>
> Fabrizio Vassallo
> Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica
> Pisa
> Italy

-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
      http://www.dejanews.com/     Search, Read, Post to Usenet