Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: UFS vs. Veritas FS

Re: UFS vs. Veritas FS

From: Frank Ober <fxober_at_pacbell.com>
Date: 1997/02/28
Message-ID: <33170CE8.6432@pacbell.com>#1/1

Markus wrote:
>
> Anyone here have any experience using Veritas FS
> in a production environment using Oracle?
> I like the fact that Veritas FS is tuned for performance
> on Oracle and that it's a journaled filesystem.
> However, since it's so new I don't know what the
> reliability on it is, compared with the time-tested ufs.
> I appreciate any input on this matter.
>
> Markus

I run an Oracle 7.3.2.2 database on Veritas filesystems with good results. I have used straight concatenated disks and the performance is good. I also switched to RAID5 filesystems and found that you must enable fast writes on your disks in order to get fair performance from the filesystem. I would not recommend a RAID5 filesystem for the an Oracle Database unless you don't care too much about performance. Another option that would probably work better than RAID5 is RAID0 which is less complicated on the write side and therefore probably offers better write performance.

I see no detriment in using Veritas Filesystems,in fact there are several things that make using Veritas/Sun Volume Manager a good choice including utilities like `vxstat` which will show you how your volumes are performing.
Good luck.

-- 
Frank Ober
Received on Fri Feb 28 1997 - 00:00:00 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US