MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ls Cheng <exriscer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 07:42:53 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ2-Qb93R+j0UpgGNTT2dRyZt9RswuvZzKFPQqtfkLRJ-uutKw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: DBFS and periodic reorganization
To: Oracle Mailinglist <oracle-l@freelists.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009410ed05b3cf1b10"
Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Precedence: normal
Reply-To: exriscer@gmail.com
--0000000000009410ed05b3cf1b10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi

Does anyone use DBFS and observe that periodic reorganization is required?
We are deciding which filesystem to use to store the goldengate trails, we
are deciding between ACFS and DBFS.

DBFS was being considered because we need to replicate the trails to a
disaster recovery site, since DBFS is part of the database it seemed
suitable. But if DBFS needs periodic reorganization then it is definitely a
NO candidate because the reorganization needs twice space, another
tablespace etc. Not a simple task.

Any experiences with DBFS and periodic reorganization?

BR

--0000000000009410ed05b3cf1b10
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi=C2=A0<div><br></div><div>Does anyone use DBFS and obser=
ve that periodic reorganization is required? We are deciding which filesyst=
em=C2=A0to use to store the goldengate trails, we are deciding between ACFS=
 and DBFS.</div><div><br></div><div>DBFS was being considered because we ne=
ed to replicate the trails to a disaster recovery site, since DBFS is part =
of the database it seemed suitable. But if DBFS needs periodic reorganizati=
on then it is definitely a NO candidate because the reorganization needs tw=
ice space, another tablespace etc. Not a simple task.</div><div><br></div><=
div>Any experiences with DBFS and=C2=A0periodic reorganization?</div><div><=
br></div><div>BR</div></div>

--0000000000009410ed05b3cf1b10--
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l