Return-Path: X-Original-To: oracle-l@orafaq.com Delivered-To: oracle-l@orafaq.com Received: from puck1183.startdedicated.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by puck1183.startdedicated.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2F4196023E for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 16:48:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by puck1183.startdedicated.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 16:48:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 337D63898A; Thu, 5 May 2016 10:48:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at turing.freelists.org Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9P5G4uUpbFma; Thu, 5 May 2016 10:48:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 10B223899C; Thu, 5 May 2016 10:48:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Thu, 05 May 2016 10:46:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 2230F3898A; Thu, 5 May 2016 10:46:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k1P4Hln5mDLt; Thu, 5 May 2016 10:46:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailgw1.nbs.sk (mailgw1.nbs.sk [193.87.134.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTPS id BD2D838986; Thu, 5 May 2016 10:46:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail1.localdomain (unknown [172.22.202.17]) by mailgw1.nbs.sk with smtp id 3822_30ca_2ec8dad9_587f_4eff_b28d_ee76541faa03; Thu, 05 May 2016 16:46:33 +0200 Received: from lnscom1.nbs.sk (lnscom1.ad.nbs.sk [172.22.205.26]) by mail1.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA7873; Thu, 5 May 2016 16:46:50 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: References: To: christopherdtaylor1994@gmail.com Cc: ORACLE-L , oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Quick Question - NU Licenses use 0.5 multiplier or not? X-KeepSent: 749BD4AD:77024D13-C1257FAA:004F7EC0; type=4; name=$KeepSent Message-ID: From: Marian Bednar Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 16:46:32 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on LNSCOM1/NBS/SK(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 05. 05. 2016 16:46:34, Serialize complete at 05. 05. 2016 16:46:34 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00512A9FC1257FAA_=" X-archive-position: 64824 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: bednar@nbs.sk Precedence: normal Reply-To: bednar@nbs.sk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: oracle-l X-List-ID: oracle-l List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: oracle-l --=_alternative 00512A9FC1257FAA_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" in case of Enterprise Edition, yes, you can apply Core Factor Acorrding to Oracle SOFTWARE INVESTMENT GUIDE on page 13 http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/pricing/sig-070616.pdf Number of processors is the same number in Processor metric and also in the Named User Plus minimum also in this document for SE "for Database Standard Edition 2 are 10 Named User Plus licenses per server" - page 13 "Oracle Database Standard Edition 2 may only be licensed on servers that have a maximum capacity of 2 sockets" - page 14 Marian From: Chris Taylor To: ORACLE-L , Date: 05. 05. 2016 16:02 Subject: Quick Question - NU Licenses use 0.5 multiplier or not? Sent by: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org When using the Named User metric, does the 0.5 multiplier still apply for licensing or not? Example: 2 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2637 v2 8 Cores/ 16 threads / 3.5 GHz CPU Licensing = 4 (8 x 0.5) NU Licensing = 25 * 4= 100, or is it 25 * 8 = 200? Thanks, Chris --=_alternative 00512A9FC1257FAA_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" in case of Enterprise Edition, yes, you can apply Core Factor
Acorrding to Oracle SOFTWARE INVESTMENT GUIDE on page 13 http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/pricing/sig-070616.pdf
Number of processors is the same number in Processor metric and also in the Named User Plus minimum

also in this document for SE
"for Database Standard Edition 2 are 10 Named User Plus licenses per server"        - page 13
"Oracle Database Standard Edition 2 may only be licensed on servers that have a maximum capacity of 2 sockets"         - page 14

Marian




From:        Chris Taylor <christopherdtaylor1994@gmail.com>
To:        ORACLE-L <oracle-l@freelists.org>,
Date:        05. 05. 2016 16:02
Subject:        Quick Question - NU Licenses use 0.5 multiplier or not?
Sent by:        oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org



When using the Named User metric, does the 0.5 multiplier still apply for licensing or not?

Example:
2 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2637 v2
8 Cores/ 16 threads / 3.5 GHz

CPU Licensing = 4 (8 x 0.5)

NU Licensing = 25 * 4= 100, or is it 25 * 8 = 200?

Thanks,
Chris


--=_alternative 00512A9FC1257FAA_=-- -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l