Re: Real life implementation of 7 year data retention requirement

From: Kevin Jernigan <kevin.jernigan_at_oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:09:15 -0800
Message-ID: <52FD428B.7030208_at_oracle.com>



One more clarification: as of 11.2.0.4, Flashback Data Archive is available in EE AND SE. So you can develop and test on SE, then deploy at scale on EE (maybe with Advanced Compression to "optimize" the FDA history tables)...KJ
-- 
Kevin Jernigan
Senior Director Product Management
Advanced Compression, Hybrid Columnar
Compression (HCC), Database File System
(DBFS), SecureFiles, Database Smart Flash
Cache, Total Recall, Database Resource
Manager (DBRM), Direct NFS Client (dNFS),
Continuous Query Notification (CQN),
Index Organized Tables (IOT), Information
Lifecycle Management (ILM)
+1-650-607-0392 (o)
+1-415-710-8828 (m)

On 2/13/14, 1:54 PM, Ruel, Chris wrote:

>
> I'll add that if you are on 11.2.0.4 Flashback Data Archive is
> included with the EE license. You just can't use it in conjunction
> with Advanced Compression...unless of course you license AC.
>
> From the license doc:
> http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/license.112/e47877/editions.htm#DBLIC117
>
> For releases earlier than Oracle Database 11g Release 2 (11.2.0.4):
> You must license the Oracle Advanced Compression option to use
> Flashback Data Archive (formerly known as Total Recall).
>
> Beginning with Oracle Database 11g Release 2 (11.2.0.4): You must
> license the Oracle Advanced Compression option to use Optimization for
> Flashback Data Archive history tables. *Basic Flashback Data
> Archive---without history table optimization---is available in all
> editions.*
>
> Chris Ruel * Oracle Database Administrator
>
> cruel_at_lfg.com <mailto:cruel_at_lfg.com>* Desk:317.759.2172 * Cell
> 317.523.8482
>
> *From:*oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] *On Behalf Of *Kevin Jernigan
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 13, 2014 4:33 PM
> *To:* freek.dhooge_at_gmail.com; frits.hoogland_at_gmail.com
> *Cc:* yparesh_at_gmail.com; WLJohnson_at_te.com;
> rjoralist3_at_society.servebeer.com; oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> *Subject:* Re: Real life implementation of 7 year data retention
> requirement
>
> As the PM for Flashback Data Archive (FDA), I strongly agree with your
> suggestion to use FDA to keep track of all changes to data over time
> ;-) This will give you easy Flashback Query access to view your data
> AS OF any point in time back to "the beginning of time" (i.e. whenever
> you enabled FDA on the underlying tables).
>
> Now you might be saying "Wait a minute, that's a lot of disk space /
> expense / etc!" And you might be right - but you can use compression,
> partitioning, and even HCC on Oracle Storage to keep the older
> FDA-managed history data online in cheaper / denser storage, while
> transparently keeping the more recent (usually hotter) data on Tier 1
> storage etc etc. And, the question is always "What's the value to the
> business of having online access to the historical data using
> Flashback Query?" versus the slower more complex approach of restoring
> the right backup, rolling forward to the right point in time, etc etc...
>
> -KJ
>
> --
> Kevin Jernigan
> Senior Director Product Management
> Advanced Compression, Hybrid Columnar
> Compression (HCC), Database File System
> (DBFS), SecureFiles, Database Smart Flash
> Cache, Total Recall, Database Resource
> Manager (DBRM), Direct NFS Client (dNFS),
> Continuous Query Notification (CQN),
> Index Organized Tables (IOT), Information
> Lifecycle Management (ILM)
> +1-650-607-0392 (o)
> +1-415-710-8828 (m)
>
> On 2/13/14, 12:50 PM, Freek D'Hooge wrote:
>
> But not a history of how a record changed through time.
>
> I think the reasoning behind the restore to any point between now
> and 7 years back is the need to be able to show what a record
> looked like x time back.
> If so, maybe flashback data archive and / or auditing could be
> used to fulfil such a requirement?
>
> regards,
>
> --
> Freek D'Hooge
> Exitas NV
> Senior Oracle DBA
> email: freek.dhooge_at_exitas.be <mailto:freek.dhooge_at_exitas.be>
> tel +32(03) 443 12 38
> http://www.exitas.be <http://www.exitas.be/>
>
> On do, 2014-02-13 at 21:36 +0100, Frits Hoogland wrote:
>
> Just as a bold statement, and something to think about: isn't your
> most recent backup a complete backup of all the history contained
> in your database?
>
> Frits Hoogland
>
>
>
> http://fritshoogland.wordpress.com
>
> frits.hoogland_at_gmail.com <mailto:frits.hoogland_at_gmail.com>
>
> Phone: +31 20 8946342
>
> (Sent from my iPhone, typo's are expected)
>
>
> Op 13 feb. 2014 om 21:13 heeft Paresh Yadav <yparesh_at_gmail.com
> <mailto:yparesh_at_gmail.com>> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Thank you David, Rich, Frits, and Johnson for
> your useful replies.
>
> The point about compatibility and cost is very important.
> Isn't it necessary by law with so many businesses to
> retain 7 years of data? What do people do in this case? In
> many places that I know of (including fortune 100
> organizations) there is a 7 year retention policy for
> backup in place but as I had mentioned God only knows what
> actually happens to those tapes. At times I have asked to
> test a restore from backup taken long time a go but no one
> wants to open that can of worms.
>
> Thanks
> Paresh
>
> 416-688-1003
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Johnson, William L (TEIS)
> <WLJohnson_at_te.com <mailto:WLJohnson_at_te.com>> wrote:
>
> I may be kicked off this list for making this
> comment...but I would look into a simple Hadoop cluster to
> store the data...I am not sure if your data is written
> once and done - or if you update it frequently, but there
> is a lot to be said for the cost/TB and the ability to
> store data long term in a Hadoop cluster.
> Bill
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
> <mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org>
> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
> <mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org>] On Behalf Of
> Rich Jesse
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 12:36 PM
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org <mailto:oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
> Subject: Re: Real life implementation of 7 year data
> retention requirement
>
> Paresh writes:
>
> > period (say 6 or 7 years from "now") (e.g.
> challenges in locating the
> > tapes (physical or virtual), rman catalog not having
> record of backup
> > pieces for the time period etc.). Does magnetic tape
> remain good for 7
> > years in a climate controlled environment or you do
> copy them after 3
> > years or so to a new tape? If yes, is this automated
> as manual process
> > will be too much cumbersome and prone to errors.
>
> And don't forget about compatibility. For example, an
> LTO-3 tape written 7 years ago won't be able to be
> read on an LTO-6 drive -- a very plausible timeline
> example.
>
> Rich
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
> Notice of Confidentiality: **This E-mail and any of its attachments
> may contain
> Lincoln National Corporation proprietary information, which is
> privileged, confidential,
> or subject to copyright belonging to the Lincoln National Corporation
> family of
> companies. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the
> individual or entity to
> which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this
> E-mail, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or
> action taken in
> relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly
> prohibited
> and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please
> notify the
> sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of
> this E-mail
> and any printout. Thank You.**
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Feb 13 2014 - 23:09:15 CET

Original text of this message