Re: Do we have to disable NUMA to configure HugePages?

From: Mark Bobak <Mark.Bobak_at_proquest.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:32:06 +0000
Message-ID: <CE7D9ED3.38357%Mark.Bobak_at_ProQuest.com>



Hi,

At OOW this year, I had the opportunity to see Steve Shaw of Intel speak about performance of Intel CPUs with Oracle database workloads.

You didn't mention what architecture you're running, so, I'm not sure how much of the following applies to your environment. If you *are* on Intel, then read on.

First, although Oracle does currently recommend disabling NUMA, my understanding from Mr. Shaw's talk, was mainly that it's disabled cause it can be tricky to get the configuration right, and on systems with a small (4 or less) number of sockets, the benefits of NUMA are limited. On larger systems with lots of sockets, NUMA can make a bigger difference.

But, my interpretation of his position was "let's enable NUMA, get it right, and not leave any performance on the table".

Specifically on the topic of NUMA configuration and hugepages, see this article:
https://communities.intel.com/community/datastack/blog/2013/09/13/configuri ng-memory-for-oracle-on-linux

For several various blog entries about optimizing Oracle on Intel, see this list:
https://communities.intel.com/people/steveshaw/content?itemView=detail

Hope that helps,

-Mark

On 10/11/13 12:12 PM, "fmh" <fmhabash_at_gmail.com> wrote:

>I have seen references in MOS docs (Doc ID 1484809.1) & (803238.1) to
>disable NUMA before configuring HPs. They were specific to 10g and 11.1.
>Is this required for 11.2 (or may be at all)? Can't locate a clear cut
>answer.
>
>--
>
>----------------------------------------
>Thank you.
>
>
>--
>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Oct 11 2013 - 18:32:06 CEST

Original text of this message