RE: Hugepages question with multiple instances on 1 host

From: <Christopher.Taylor2_at_parallon.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:12:38 -0500
Message-ID: <F05D8DF1FB25F44085DB74CB916678E8879DC811CA_at_NADCWPMSGCMS10.hca.corpad.net>



Thanks Mark (a couple of things):

a.) see my reply to Andrew - it was more of speed thing to get it cycled up to production - maybe it really wouldn't save much time anyway doing 1 vs 4 devs/ and 4 QAs.

b.) You mention ASM, is there a "gotcha" here I need to be aware of?

Thanks again for all the input guys.

Chris

-----Original Message-----

From: Bobak, Mark [mailto:Mark.Bobak_at_proquest.com] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 10:50 AM
To: JC1706_at_att.com; Taylor Christopher - Nashville; afatkulin_at_gmail.com Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: Hugepages question with multiple instances on 1 host

Also, consider, if you're going through the trouble of configuring hugepages, you might as well do it for all instances.

While it's true that you'd probably want hugepages configured for a system w/ a 32GB SGA, and it's probably not necessary to do so for the 4GB SGA, there's really no harm in configuring hugepages for both. There's really no downside.

My rule of thumb, when it comes to hugepages is that if you're not using them, you're doing it wrong, with the one exception being ASM instances.

-Mark
--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Mon Apr 29 2013 - 19:12:38 CEST

Original text of this message