DBA_DATA_FILES inconsistency?
From: Rich <richa03_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:23:54 -0800
Message-ID: <CALgGkeB+0YXvxHWiGB1e9ftBfqzeHpm27QFGv4HZ2WBFastuRw_at_mail.gmail.com>
Hi List,
This is Oracle EE 10.2.0.5 on Solaris 5.10.
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:23:54 -0800
Message-ID: <CALgGkeB+0YXvxHWiGB1e9ftBfqzeHpm27QFGv4HZ2WBFastuRw_at_mail.gmail.com>
Hi List,
This is Oracle EE 10.2.0.5 on Solaris 5.10.
From SQL:
select FILE_NAME, FILE_ID, TABLESPACE_NAME, BLOCKS, STATUS, AUTOEXTENSIBLE,
MAXBLOCKS, INCREMENT_BY, USER_BLOCKS, ONLINE_STATUS
from dba_data_files where tablespace_name like 'HUB%';
I see the following:
FILE_NAME FILE_ID TABLESPACE_NAME BLOCKSSTATUS AUT MAXBLOCKS INCREMENT_BY USER_BLOCKS ONLINE_
----------------------------------- ---------- --------------- ------------ --------- --- ------------ ------------ ------------ -------
/u01/insta/data/hubaaaa_03.dbf 17 HUBAAAA 3,840,000
AVAILABLE YES 3,840,000 128 3,839,984 ONLINE
/u01/insta/data/hubaaaa_02.dbf 16 HUBAAAA 3,840,000
AVAILABLE YES 3,840,000 128 3,839,984 ONLINE
/u01/insta/data/hubaaaa_01.dbf 10 HUBAAAA 3,840,000
AVAILABLE YES 2,560,000 1280 3,839,984 ONLINE
/u01/insta/data/hubaaaaindx_01.dbf 2 HUBAAAAINDX 1,190,400
AVAILABLE YES 2,560,000 1280 1,190,392 ONLINE
Am I missing something?
Shouldn't MAXBLOCKS be larger than BLOCKS (and USERBLOCKS) for FILE_NAME
/u01/insta/data/hubaaaa_01.dbf (FILE_ID 10)?
Anyone seen anything like this?
Thanks,
Rich
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Feb 15 2013 - 17:23:54 CET