Re: New architecture using Clusterware

From: John Thompson <jhthomp_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:45:48 -0600
Message-ID: <CABLVpbs8yN0434qegzNjOLUqrqJyFLQgk5-KXXjGtzq49GTzXw_at_mail.gmail.com>



We currently run all our production databases on Redhat Linux 2-node active/passive configurations utilizing Oracle CRS and ASM. To obtain HA, we created CRS resources via "create_profile". Database Oracle Home resides on ASM created file systems. Works beautifully. On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Dennis Williams < oracledba.williams_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> List,
> Traditionally we've supported databases with Solaris servers using VCS.
> These are medium-sized databases with average availability requirements.
> Nothing leading-edge.
> We are considering a new cluster of servers. I'm wondering if Linux and
> Oracle Clusterware (but not RAC) is a cost-effective solution that would
> provide adequate availability. Has anyone on this list taken that approach?
>
> Thanks,
> Dennis Williams
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Jan 17 2013 - 21:45:48 CET

Original text of this message