Return-Path: <oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org>
X-Original-To: oracle-l@orafaq.com
Delivered-To: oracle-l@orafaq.com
Received: from puck1183.startdedicated.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by puck1183.startdedicated.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0727919610FC
 for <oracle-l@orafaq.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:29:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180])
 by puck1183.startdedicated.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
 for <oracle-l@orafaq.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:29:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id A12F0F220B8;
 Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:29:39 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=freelists.org;
 s=turing; t=1355347779;
 bh=8wfcXegIp5i/dh31pIBf1ZqWf/GXobmF2iG81L+1XvY=;
 h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:
	 Content-type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Sender:
	 Reply-To:List-help:List-unsubscribe:List-Id:List-subscribe:
	 List-owner:List-post:List-archive;
 b=SsUABNQnAWaM/cDk+gw0p2iop2TuziR9h0gUjZt2RHZ+qQGfhUnXFjBqw76JbLx57
	 +PfO3O6iVCp2fdUeFp+0jXMuW/LwVXEf9GgF6vHOkSilwATf4pDg0yRZanThl/jcc0
	 DGEDFXB+LUH5ytJHEYBp3giQhzS2aDJDqHOJjcwM=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id Is7QWmEIPdzX; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:29:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id E8FF4F20918;
 Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:28:54 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=freelists.org;
 s=turing; t=1355347777;
 bh=8wfcXegIp5i/dh31pIBf1ZqWf/GXobmF2iG81L+1XvY=;
 h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:
	 Content-type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Sender:
	 Reply-To:List-help:List-unsubscribe:List-Id:List-subscribe:
	 List-owner:List-post:List-archive;
 b=m9l34QXrMtvinTFzqhJv+t1qVIQ645LRdaeiImYV9MzTy+n8jpAhQ0MMo2R1SH3fV
	 BFu7WNZb5dub2WPswdsOi1eLSPI9VaSGOJj/vORddjfjLli88daz+Y5yM8ITo4U9aD
	 U30DvwlmnD+9KKC03008TVzkrHLO18ICE5ViFuC8=
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:28:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 8BC48F208F4
 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:28:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id Wy1nk-Ml2eVI for <oracle-l@freelists.org>;
 Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:28:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pps.mail.medcity.net (hcacorpqol.net [199.91.33.184])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 2B780F2083C
 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:28:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pps.mail.medcity.net ([10.26.43.101])
 by NADCLZMSGPMG01B.medcity.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBCLS9N4017187
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
 Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:28:10 -0600
Received: from nadcwpmsght02.hca.corpad.net (nrdc-f5-frontside.mgmt.medcity.net [10.26.109.5])
 by NADCLPMSGPMG02B.hca.corpad.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBCLS9cB011993
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT);
 Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:28:09 -0600
Received: from NADCWPMSGCMS10.hca.corpad.net ([10.26.103.29]) by
 nadcwpmsght02.hca.corpad.net ([10.26.103.52]) with mapi; Wed, 12 Dec 2012
 15:28:09 -0600
From: <Christopher.Taylor2@parallon.net>
To: <Mark.Bobak@proquest.com>, <curtisbl@gmail.com>, <oracle-l@freelists.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:28:08 -0600
Subject: RE: Linux OCFS/OCFS2 alternatives for RAC shared storage systems?
Thread-Topic: Linux OCFS/OCFS2 alternatives for RAC shared storage systems?
Message-ID: <F05D8DF1FB25F44085DB74CB916678E88568245453@NADCWPMSGCMS10.hca.corpad.net>
References: <F05D8DF1FB25F44085DB74CB916678E885682451D7@NADCWPMSGCMS10.hca.corpad.net>
 <50C8E8F6.2050007@gmail.com>
 <F05D8DF1FB25F44085DB74CB916678E8856824537E@NADCWPMSGCMS10.hca.corpad.net>
 <6AFC12B9BFCDEA45B7274C534738067F017F575DA7@AAPQMAILBX02V.proque.st>
In-Reply-To: <6AFC12B9BFCDEA45B7274C534738067F017F575DA7@AAPQMAILBX02V.proque.st>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-archive-position: 46078
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
X-original-sender: Christopher.Taylor2@parallon.net
Precedence: normal
Reply-To: Christopher.Taylor2@parallon.net
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@freelists.org?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <oracle-l-request@freelists.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: oracle-l <oracle-l.freelists.org>
X-List-ID: oracle-l <oracle-l.freelists.org>
List-subscribe: <oracle-l-request@freelists.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:steve.adams@ixora.com.au>
List-post: <mailto:oracle-l@freelists.org>
List-archive: <http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l>
X-list: oracle-l

We're running Oracle database on 10.2 asm/clusterware now.

But we have filesystems that use OCFS for sharing data - such as external tables, datapumps, rman backups etc between the 3 nodes.

It's the OCFS filesystems OUTSIDE the database I'm interested in clustering with something other than OCFS.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Bobak, Mark [mailto:Mark.Bobak@proquest.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 3:11 PM
To: Taylor Christopher - Nashville; curtisbl@gmail.com; oracle-l@freelists.org
Subject: RE: Linux OCFS/OCFS2 alternatives for RAC shared storage systems?

He's saying you could upgrade your ASM/clusterware to 11.2, without messing w/ your 10.2.0.4 database, and then have ACFS filesystem available to you.

And yes, running 10.2.0.4 db on 11.2 ASM/clusterware is a supported configuration, though it may be more time and complexity than you're willing to invest, to move away from OCFS.


-Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Christopher.Taylor2@parallon.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 3:55 PM
To: curtisbl@gmail.com; oracle-l@freelists.org
Subject: RE: Linux OCFS/OCFS2 alternatives for RAC shared storage systems?

I assume we're talking about ASM clustered filesystem ACFS?  I thought that was only in 11?

We're using ASM for the datafiles (etc) in RAC.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Bobby Curtis
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 2:29 PM
To: oracle-l@freelists.org
Subject: Re: Linux OCFS/OCFS2 alternatives for RAC shared storage systems?

ASM is what most RAC clusters use.  Is there a reason why you are not using ASM?

Bobby L. Curtis
(e): curtisbl@gmail.com | (t): @curtisbl294 http://dbasolved.com

On 12/12/2012 2:56 PM, Christopher.Taylor2@parallon.net wrote:
> I'm curious if anyone uses anything other than OCFS/OCFS2 filesystems for their RAC shared storage areas?
> It seems that OCFS (our version anyway) is not extendable unless you take it offline.  A key point for me would be a clustered filesystem that is dynamically growable as needed.
>
> Anyone have any thoughts on the matter?
>
> Chris Taylor
> Oracle DBA
> Parallon IT&S
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l




--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


