RE: sheltered little world i live in -> NODB?

From: Taylor, Chris David <ChrisDavid.Taylor_at_ingrambarge.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 10:27:26 -0500
Message-ID: <C5533BD628A9524496D63801704AE56D75B26E044D_at_SPOBMEXC14.adprod.directory>



I think we'd all agree that any of the "nosql" implementations are the correct choice for 'some' applications?

But this all goes back to the earlier points that have mentioned several times now that people designing systems need to know (and plan) for the data they are generating, capturing and reporting on before they decide how they want to store it - I would imagine that the 'best' solution is often a hybrid one with different implementations for different types of data.

It *always* goes back to the data and how it's going to be generated and used. Right or no?

Chris Taylor

"Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of intelligent effort."
-- John Ruskin (English Writer 1819-1900)

Any views and/or opinions expressed herein are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Ingram Industries, its affiliates, its subsidiaries or its employees.

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Coll-Barth, Michael Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 10:05 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: sheltered little world i live in -> NODB?

I couldn't agree with you more. And don't even get me started with the NoSQL movement. But on the bright side, Java may finally die. I see people's faces when we discuss what to use on such and such new project. I saw a director actually flinch when Java was mentioned.

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Fri May 18 2012 - 10:27:26 CDT

Original text of this message