Received: (qmail 19063 invoked from network); 5 May 2012 14:14:35 -0500 Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180) by static-ip-85-25-126-90.inaddr.ip-pool.com with SMTP; 5 May 2012 14:14:31 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 8E379EC92C0; Sat, 5 May 2012 15:14:30 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=freelists.org; s=turing; t=1336245270; bh=F5Xvy3qo1a01pI39ke8noLPWsn6ALk1DEvcXFVAC EDY=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject: From:To:Cc:Content-type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender:Reply-To: List-help:List-unsubscribe:List-Id:List-subscribe:List-owner: List-post:List-archive; b=Isfq51yWnYhzj+c+/6BBUY9FFi9ULgoEe7XTYuOT Tnan0jeMmjGKpdbl3NF9lYKK6+Hw7F7E+O3qRc69X/mElcjDT++Mnl3SipAUgPMcTLA X+5cZXt1TqbqzjFSkM+ZW+lgB8cX0oTneAqsA8CUZIPA5MHRdV0FWPDBbFQM9TuU= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3vlo8gefIkBa; Sat, 5 May 2012 15:14:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 8D3DAEC56B2; Sat, 5 May 2012 15:13:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Sat, 05 May 2012 15:13:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 02256EC6106 for ; Sat, 5 May 2012 15:13:06 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: turing.freelists.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.i=@gmail.com Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4uFEXQb6kctL for ; Sat, 5 May 2012 15:13:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-vx0-f179.google.com (mail-vc0-f179.google.com [209.85.220.179]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 97614EC6041 for ; Sat, 5 May 2012 15:13:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by vcbf11 with SMTP id f11so2752384vcb.10 for ; Sat, 05 May 2012 12:13:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gN4Vpr6kBOevS4gEslRU7Y3HNtOi6zngW1pFV7k1Rsg=; b=d0WmBIx85TttVt6QNbscfTQcIk6RTBzS3stqm5afFsM9fy7ySO3UpSjwq4UFEJa8R7 eMEyHMr1kHxNTfiI+PIIaARNZEwL9Ab62hZ6S9ph5BTWDKvGvaMOQ3FPU8laX/8pwcLp OOvkrHAkICIN9+BW9gee/ey6XO995kaSd3Ycw8Aq1cPHXzAhT3417Reu4c38hoddWO2j Vk2K5hAJzC9KB5qE5RZeZHN/jCfPsD635iqFM5ZIllzXi0P2l89knyg7e0Ib5ZIHKezf xUjqa7Qlx7+EFo4ZHfumUvmtaZv62sBOe31hrGGxQuE1RdN/Y+pd2Io+UWXTF0aGrvml tQHQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.179.74 with SMTP id de10mr5222284vdc.12.1336245184902; Sat, 05 May 2012 12:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.161.2 with HTTP; Sat, 5 May 2012 12:13:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4814386347E41145AAE79139EAA398981CC0B5180C@ws03-exch07.iconos.be> Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 16:13:04 -0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: b7g-zEiGkMzbkoXCo-1qZkhbyTY Message-ID: Subject: Re: speeding up expdp From: Guillermo Alan Bort To: maureen.english@alaska.edu Cc: "D'Hooge Freek" , "oracle-l@freelists.org" Content-type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 42722 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: cicciuxdba@gmail.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: cicciuxdba@gmail.com List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: oracle-l X-List-ID: oracle-l List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: oracle-l I would suggest benchmarking the NFS. If you have a file of similar size (you can create it on the fly, though) you can try copying the file directly from the database storage (which I'm hoping is SAN) to the target directory (NAS) and see the maximum throughput you can get. I've had some dealings with NFS and it can be astoundingly slow (something the database seems to hide well enough using the SGA but is a pain for massive io) hth Alan.- On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Maureen English wrote: not quoting this -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l