Re: ASM and disk partitions offset

From: goran bogdanovic <goran00_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 12:57:19 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGyPXK53TAVtDNjJ6Vrh=5UteWyVPtmJh64EBjWt-y9jOFJCOg_at_mail.gmail.com>

Hi Dimitre,
why (in general) offset i.e. aligning is relevant (or could be relevant) has been well explained by your fellow countryman ;-) Christo:

http://www.pythian.com/news/411/aligning-asm-disks-on-linux/

cheers,
goran

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:21 AM, Radoulov, Dimitre <cichomitiko_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Thanks again!
>
> >> Cynical? Moi?
>
> Nooo :):):)
>
>
> Best regards
> Dimitre
>
> On 16/02/2012 23:32, Niall Litchfield wrote:
> > Paul Drake points out there's a later version of the vmware article I
> > reference at
> > http://www.vmware.com/pdf/Perf_Best_Practices_vSphere4.1.pdf (it says
> > the same thing as far as partition alignment goes though)
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Radoulov, Dimitre
> > <cichomitiko_at_gmail.com <mailto:cichomitiko_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > So thanks again Niall,
> > now I'm reading the articles you mentioned.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Niall Litchfield
> > Oracle DBA
> > http://www.orawin.info
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Sun Mar 04 2012 - 05:57:19 CST