Re: Standby Database performance
From: Marcin Przepiorowski <pioro1_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:25:56 +0000
Message-ID: <CAGdek=yDPq+dTPoFbpuP6OqsaormddghqEoOLujZ9XTzfpPKBg_at_mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:45 PM, kapil vaish <kapilvaish1_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> DG was not able to scale upto this level. We tried combination of parallel
> threads starting from 8 threads upto 64 . We got best perf with 32 threads.
> Will review the suggested docs .
>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:25:56 +0000
Message-ID: <CAGdek=yDPq+dTPoFbpuP6OqsaormddghqEoOLujZ9XTzfpPKBg_at_mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:45 PM, kapil vaish <kapilvaish1_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> DG was not able to scale upto this level. We tried combination of parallel
> threads starting from 8 threads upto 64 . We got best perf with 32 threads.
> Will review the suggested docs .
>
Hmmm I have seen couple of servers running at some load level (2 GB -
2.5 GB/ min)
in DG configuration in max performance mode but without RAC
I would start with detail analyze where Oracle is loosing time using Oracle wait interface.
-- Marcin Przepiorowski http://oracleprof.blogspot.com -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Nov 25 2011 - 09:25:56 CST